Your web browser (Internet Explorer) is out of date. Some things will not look right and things might not work properly. Please download an up-to-date and free browser from here.

POLL: Is Ken Ring credible?

Last night’s Campbell Live interview with Ken Ring has caused widespread anger across social networking sites, including a blog written by media commentator Brian Edwards who said Campbell was a “disgrace to the interviewer’s trade”.

Edwards is well known for being critical of interviewers in New Zealand however this time he has the support of many in the public – at least, he has support from the vocal people on Twitter.

But, interview skills aside, was Campbell simply reflecting a mood throughout Christchurch and New Zealand that Ring’s predictions have no scientific base and therefore are doing more harm than good?

Whether you liked or hated the interview is irrelevant – we want to ask you this question – Do you believe Ken Ring is a credible source for earthquake predictions?

Is Ken Ring credible?Market Research


Guest on 16/05/2011 11:33pm

Does Ken Ring have any scientific qualifications??

jade bulling on 22/03/2011 8:17am

jesus chris look how manny people are stupid and bealive him he thinks he can read cats paws if you bealive him you are an idiot

Dave Greg on 16/03/2011 12:35am

Have a look at this Youtube video and see if you still think Mr Ring is credible:–MyQ

He uses “+/- 4 days” either side of each event (full moon, new moon, king tides, perigee and apogee. This video explains what is wrong with his charts.

Guest on 12/03/2011 6:50pm

to me, this is the best indication of whether Kens theories have any substance.
Study the graph and make your own decision.

Mattingly on 10/03/2011 4:37am

Anyone got extra toilet paper

View more comments

Related Articles